ACT Network Governance and Regulatory Information

Review these resources for an overview of ACT governance documentation. These resources are not intended to serve as an exhaustive account of network policies and procedures. Please reference the ACT Governance Document for more detailed information.

ACT Governance Structure

The ACT governance structure includes required reporting to the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) through the ACT PI Group, which is made up of the four PIs listed on the NCATS grant (Steven Reis, University of Pittsburgh; Gary Firestein, UCSD; Robert Toto, UTSW; Lee Nadler, Harvard). The ACT Executive Committee reports to the ACT PI Group and provides oversight for the project. Reporting to the ACT Executive Committee are five work groups, as outlined in the figure below.
The ACT Network only shares aggregate patient counts, and never shares (or accesses) patient-level data. Each site monitors and reports on local usage of the ACT Network to ensure compliance with the ACT Data Use Agreement.
Link to ACT Terms of Query Access (DUA)
Part of the ACT implementation process at each site involves applying for approval from the site’s IRB. No additional study-specific IRB approval is needed for investigators using ACT.
Each ACT user must agree to the Terms of Query Access before gaining access to the ACT tool. The terms of access ensure that only approved users are accessing the network and using it for its intended purpose. Each site manages this approval process differently. To read the terms in their entirety, please find the 
Terms of Query Access here.

Each ACT site is expected to adhere to the following:


  • Stay current on software versioning as guided by ACT Network Operations
  • Ensure integrity of data use by regularly monitoring local query activity
  • Adhere to expected uptime policies and work through issues in a timely manner
  • Refresh data on at least a monthly basis


The decision to participate in any study using ACT is at the discretion of the ACT Network site. There is no obligation for a site to participate in a study proposed by another ACT site.


ACT governance also outlines three standard operating procedures for ACT and ACT sites, listed below.

SOP 1: Adding New or Modifying Existing Data Domains. The Data Harmonization work group defined a set of data domains (e.g. demographics, diagnoses, procedures) and standards for representing data in these domains. As ACT continues to evolve, there is the need to modify current domains and add new domains. This SOP lists the process required to suggest additions and modifications to the ACT data domains. 


SOP 2: Process for User Registration and Management. This SOP ensures that the ACT Network is accessed only by individuals authorized by a participating ACT site. User registration and management is handled locally at each ACT site.


SOP 3: Monitoring and Auditing. To ensure ACT achieves its goals and participating sites operate in accordance with ACT governance, query activity will be periodically audited by local site Data Stewards. Only authorized individuals will have access to information that can identify the user. Network usage metrics will also be collected on a regular basis, but will not include user identifying information.

For more information, please reference the 
ACT Governance Document
. If you have further questions, you may reach out to your Site Operations Coordinator and Data Steward.

Publications based on research using the ACT Network must cite the NCATS ACT grant: “This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health through grant UL1TR001857 .” Publications should also cite the appropriate CTSA hub grant numbers from participating institutions. 


Any Intellectual Property derived from use of the ACT Network must cite the NCATS ACT grant: “This project was supported by the National Institutes of Health through grant UL1TR001857 .” 


Publications in which data source partners (hospitals) are to be identified by name will be reviewed for use of name only by each identified hospital prior to submission of a manuscript. At no time will specific participating data source partners be named unless explicitly approved by the data partner. Such approval must be requested and received in writing between the requestor and the Senior Vice President of Research, the Chief Information Officer, or their respective designee. Any entity (e.g., hospital) that does not agree to be identified by name as a data source will be instead identified as a “CTSA-affiliated hospital.”